![]() Those extra 2-4 steps of connecting additional equipment really matter. But it's like the difference between my electric guitars and acoustic guitars: I'm much more likely to pick up an acoustic guitar in a pinch (or moment of inspiration), even if I'm technically hearing electric guitar sounds in my head. As my workflow prioritizes minimal "screen time" (because I get so much already), I find it far more convenient to just turn on the digital piano and start playing and capture the midi performance that I then pipe through Pianoteq later for sound generation or perhaps some note editing. How does Pianoteq integrate into your workflow? How often and in what scenarios do you use the standalone vs the plugin?įor me, I'm finding I use it most to process midi piano performances into a realistic piano sound, as embedded hardware digital piano sounds are getting good enough to not bug me for use in performance or throw off my (already hack) technique. ![]() What is your signal chain in each case? (e.g., what is the flow of data within and between hardware - not a general discussion of hardware you use itself, although it doesn't hurt to mention your specific hardware and software makes and models that you use in the signal chain) ![]() Do you use it for live performance? Do you use it mainly in the studio? If in the studio, do you use it for live audio capture, or to process midi piano performances into a realistic piano sound, or both? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |